|     |  
 Lily Brown
 Rust or Go Missing
 Cleveland  State University Poetry Center
 2010
 $15.95
  Lily  Brown’s first book, Rust or Go Missing, interrogates the problematic relationship between what we term the natural and  the artificial.  The "natural,"  be it a state of being or a pastoral ideal, can never be accessed purely or  directly, but only through culturally determined modes of interpretation. Thus,  Duke Senior in As You Like It cannot  praise nature without invoking civilization, finding "books in the running  brooks, / sermons in stones" and Wallace Steven's "Anecdote of the  Jar" shows us how a manmade object is the lens through which we view the  natural world. Similarly, Lily Brown presents the natural world as either  viewed through a human lens or viewed as human. The latter effect is accomplished by personifying elements of the  landscape, such as “In January the hills/unbutton their pants,” and “hill with  cleft-chin.” In moments like these, Brown brings into question how we see the  world and how our seeing changes it, a concern she raises repeatedly in lines  such as, “I work to my eye” and “To mold, with one’s hands,/the cliff fog, I  use my eye.” Often, the personification is humorous and effective, but at times  skirts the line of preciousness, and occasionally I wanted the landscape to  just stay still. Brown seems aware of this danger, and some lines seem designed  to excuse or justify the personification, such as, “The imagination asked for  all the cities, / for the canopy to get its machines out / and tile the  leaves.”
 More  satisfying are Brown’s poems showing the natural world as passively experienced  via human construction or technology. In the poem “Sitting in the Car,” Brown  beautifully captures the experience of observing the natural world while  traveling by car, in which “Sideways, we are/bodies; one dimension, / being  moved.” The speaker watches the “Deer-faced cows / in the open range,” a line  that overlays wildness on the domesticated, deer on the cows, open on the  range, so that the wild and the tamed are inextricably conflated. In this poem,  the natural world coexists with human technology but is possibly damaged by it.  We watch “Swallows fall from / wire” and then later “the black bird tucks her  wings. Swallows / all from wire.”  
 Birds  return, as do other repeated images: windows, the ocean, staircases, books,  cars, dogs, hills, and sheets, among others. Often, this repeated imagery  serves to create a sense of conversation between poems, an effect further  amplified by the book’s thoughtful ordering. For instance, “Its Character” ends  with “…the tree line sticks the clouds” and the following poem, “Smaller Gulls  Before,” begins with “I want the tree a mile up to shake.” Much of the imagery,  such as windows, television screens, and hills, reinforces Brown’s concerns  about how we view the natural world. Occasionally, however, the repeated  imagery remains a kind of private language of meaning. “Sheets” for instance,  recurs in several poems, and it is unclear whether the imagery means anything  beyond the immediate associations of carnality. The effect of this can be  disappointing and exclusionary, such as when reading, “In the Shins,” a lovely  poem that accomplishes many of Brown’s aims effortlessly, but ends with,  “Sheets nudge and crease and burn. / Sheets aren’t places. Sheets aren’t /  family or places.” As last lines, they bear a lot of pressure, and it’s  difficult to know what to do with them in the context of the rest of the poem,  which begins with the beautiful stanza:
 Nothing means like a poem meansto court me, like a poem means
 like burnt wood to flake off.
 This  kind of fierce enjambment is not unusual for Brown, and she typically uses it  to accentuate her wordplay. In the opening poem, “Backpedaling for Statements,“  Brown builds the world that the book explores, one where “window cases  mini-landscape.” The window frames the landscape, and window, again  personified, sizes up the landscape. The world Brown builds starts out simple,  a mere “impression / of groundcover and tree with sunlight” but is then  complicated by requests for more information: “She wants to know the climate /  of the room where I last wrote.”  The speaker, attempting to satisfy this  interrogator, adds more and more detail, until the woods suddenly contain a golf  course, the golf course contains a “fake fountain,” and finally “Oh god, in the  restaurant we overhang / the ocean, overhand the ocean, underlie / erosion.”  The commercial dangles over the real, and music enters, people enter, and  finally, feeling enters, a sort of panic: “Oh god, / you’ve confirmed the  voices, the moonlight.” It’s  moments like these, when some emotion or hint of relationship sneaks in, that  the poems are most successful, such as in “Knower,” where “First I was alone,  /waiting. Then I was alone/alone.” These simple lines convey a real sadness,  and the speaker becomes more concrete and less diffuse than in other  poems.  While Brown’s concerns are more  cerebral on the whole, it’s these moments of warmth that change the landscape  of the book itself. --Rebecca Hazelton Rebecca Hazelton is the Jay C. and Ruth Hall Poetry Fellow at the Creative  Writing Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her work is forthcoming in The Southern Review and The Gettysburg Review, and has appeared  in webConjunctions, Pleiades, and Field.   |  |